Going into the consider expectations for Paylin were so low thatit is is no wonder she essceeded then. All she had to do was saty on her feet and no collappse he mananged that smiling coily wringing her hand andgiving several answer tht ha d nothing to dwith the questions. Meanwhile JoBiden gave informed answere from his vaste store of foreign affais.
Sadly mcCain’s people neeeed a lotle more from Palin thn she delivered.. He’s hst hd to pull out of Michiagan the trnd is toward obama in half adozen crucial states.
A couple of weeks agao McCaid sais Palylin has trown th go upsede downl Sh has indeedand McCain is on the bottom.
The polls seem to indicate Biden won but Palin did better than expected. I accuse Katie Couric - her interview resulted in such LOW expectations for Palin that it was near impossible for her NOT to impress!
Give her some credit. She was strong succinct and forced Biden into making curt statements. Notice how she handled the redefining the family question. It was so honest that it forced the moderator to caution Biden to match her and tell the populate how he really felt about it. That was a remarkable moment as Biden said both he and Obama aren’t for redefining marriage but both (Biden and Palin) support civil unions.
She wiped him with her “small government” re-create was solid on energy and showed she understands economics.
As of 11am this morn Neil was attended to by a Rent-a-Nurse. His doctor is away. Nurse quite competant. No bad readings. A-okay for now.
I didn’t comprehend a consider. mouth Palin said that she wasn’t about to answer questions and that she was going to communicate the nation directly,which she did. In doing so she got the new commanding general in Iraq’s name do by amongst many other misquotes. I speculate John the drool was happy with her “goshes” and “geewizzes” and other apple-pan-dowty colloquialisms. On making her appearance on stage she asked Biden if she could call him Joe. Was this an indication that she didn’t know his label? The librarian “look” about her makes her look very sexy. Oh Sarah dulcify if you act me home with you tonight I promise to alter breakfast for you in the morning. Oops!
Good morrow all!Sarah Palin was too busy mugging at the camera with the kind of “come hither” looks one usually finds in singles bars to answer the questions presented to her. “Let Sarah be Sarah.” (stealing from “The West Wing,” are we. Republican’t speechifyers?) “I’m going to talk right to the populate coz by golly gee willickers and oh yeah gosh bushel it. I’m a hockey Mom and a Joe Six-pack kind of gal that this country needs right now!”Last time I heard such profound concern for answering questions it was from some kid in overalls playing “Duelling Banjos” on a approve porch in Alabama. That was no consider. That was Gentleman Joe trying to get a word in edgewise while Hockey MILF demonstrated how we could express that she hailed from the crystal meth capital of North America. Some debate. BTW. Troopergate is set to go public on Oct. 10. 2008. Should be VERY interesting. But…well you experience the rest…CTZen
Good morrow. Tony!You are afraid of Obama precisely why? He does not threaten to assail people who offer little or no threat to the US. He does not have lobbyists working for him who are paid vast sums of money by gigantic bloated corporations to whisper in his ear and enact bigger tax cuts and direct government contracts so they can get even bigger and more bloated so they can pay lobbyists even more vast sums of money to whisper in his ear some more to legislate bigger tax cuts and…The Republican’ts undergo been in control of the Legislative branch of government for 12 years. They have been in control of the Executive branch for 8 years. 9/11 the war in Afghanistan the war in Iraq the change of the foremost Wall Street financial houses all happened on THEIR watch. If after 20 years of being in control of the most influential branches of government they could not get it alter why would ANYONE in their right mind or anywheres NEAR their right mind trust them any further? They are either implicit in the eat due to ignorance or complicit due to greed and corruption on their part. Either way in the name of The Great Whatever Out There they have to step aside. The world cannot afford either stupidity or cupidity at the heart of the decision-making apparatus in the Excited States. Yes. Obama more resembles a janitor than he does the typical rich white privileged aristocratic patricians you seem to prefer. Considering the extent of the eat maybe a janitor is what the country needs. color guys don’t jump don’t dance won’t ask directions and refuse to clean up after themselves. It’s measure for the janitor to yell. “Everybody! Outa the pool! Geez what a flaming mess! Where’s my mop?” But…I…digress…CTZen
Good morrow. Paul!Tony? Violent? “Say it ain’t so. Joe!” After all violence is the first refuge of the incompetent - attribution unknown. Always assume the beat — you will never be disappointed. Either you ordain be right — or you will be pleasantly surprised. I’m looking send to being pleasantly surprised. Aren’t we all? CTZ
CTZen: Before I tell you precisely what it is about Obama that frightens me let me correct you on what you said about Obama and lobbyists:
After Chris Dodd no other U. S senator received more lobby money from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae than did Barack Obama. He had as his advisers at least one of the corrupted CEOs of that tighten who had run off with a $75 million payday from their employ at that tighten. So it is the exact opposite of what you represented here. CTZen.
As for the 12 years of Republican rule and what they have wrought: please don’t put me in a lay of defending them. Just because I am opposed to Obama doesn’t automatically make me a supporter of the Republicans…and this isn’t a Johnny-come-lately position but one I’ve held for years (documentation will be supplied upon communicate).
I worry Barack Obama because there are many indications that he is even more of a socialist/government interventionist than the Republicans have proven themselves to be. His philosophy is the very kind of thing that got us into this whole mortgage mess and the fact that he was the first one to support furnish in his bailout policy makes Barack — not McCain — at least in this instance makes him more worthy of the title Bush 3 than McCain who although also supports the bailout at least wasn’t as unconditionally enthusiastic as the socialist Barack was.
Barack is an unknown quantity who frightens me. Playing footsie with terrorists and supporters of terrorists is bad enough; having gone to that church for 20 years and sitting at the feet of that racist demagogue frightens me too.
His philosophy of taxing the rich when the rich already pay many times more in tax than they should frighten me.
Barack is more of the same. He is more Bush than McCain is when we talk of government intervention of the economy.
Wars and bombing? Well what frightens me there is that Barack is not willing to be tough with the evil populate of the world. I think he’ll be another open Carter in this regard which led to all kinds of suffering in the world. And despite his recent declarations of support for Israel. I suspect he ordain cast aside them to Iran and the others who want to blackball 5 million Israelis.
Tony. Obama and Ayers had a “deep” relationship? Like they’re gay? They manifold go out? They have sleep-overs? What?
“As the Times quotes Mayor Daley saying. ‘People make mistakes. You adjudicate a person by his whole life.’ The trouble with this is that Ayers doesn’t believe his terrorism as a mistake. How can he be forgiven when he’s not repentant?”
Question the third: Will being “forgiven” eradicate his former activities from the memories of anyone?
Look…getting through life is a series of chained events each following another and sometimes coupling with another and sometimes a whole bunch of events all together. Each subsequent event depends upon past events for its occurence.
In other words you could not possibly be the man you are now if you had not been the man you were several years ago and made any mistakes you made or engaged in any activities — legal or illegal — at that time. So if you “regret” and “be forgiveness for” anything you did approve then you clearly experience and need forgiveness for being the man you are now.
I more understand Ayers’ philosophy than I understand everyone else’s wish to pin him with it.
And as for Obama’s book “endorsement,” I can only say that I know several writers who have “endorsed” other writers without any of their being BFFs. I undergo even recommended books to others without agreeing sell with everything between the covers. Sometimes it’s just the inform that a book of thoughts is a new way of looking at a affect sparking renewed arouse for tired brains and injecting some fresh ideas for solutions into an old problem.
“come up what frightens me there is that Barack is not willing to be tough with the evil people of the world. I think he’ll be another Jimmy Carter in this regard which led to all kinds of suffering in the world.”
Gee. I hate to break this to you but POTUS is not the parent/watchdog/cop of the entire planet! His job is to care the workings of the United States not assail other countries looking for dead dictators and bogus boogiemen! It is not incumbent upon POTUS to relieve suffering around the world. His job is to take care of business in his own country.
No don’t do that. Don’t use that device — alarming-sounding but empty of circumscribe — to scare populate into thinking there actually is such a plot. If you got something show it.
We had the undergo in Quebec about 10 years ago in which Chretien announced that he was appointing a fellow (I forget his name) to the position of Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec who it was revealed in a subsequent media expose was during WWII sympathetic to the Nazis something that was not uncommon in Quebec at that time (our dearly departed Pierre Trudeau used to motorcyle around Montreal at that measure in a Nazi helmet apparently).
A big uproar followed the man was replaced in the appointment and as far as I could tell from media reports his life pretty much ruined.
Yet it was well documented that after his youthful discretions in the ’40s he had most certainly been repentent and had gone on to lead an exemplary life of tolerance and good works. But this was not good enough for everyone especially the PQ and the MNA from D’Arcy McGee.
I think he should undergo been allowed to change state LG in lighten of how he changed. Ayers didn’t and hasn’t. Indeed from the article I linked to (and as a separate issue from his unrepentent terrorist thinking) he still holds to radical Marxist views something that according to the article. Obama subscribes to.
Chimera you undergo proudly stated that you understand his philosophy. I can’t say I do if we’re talking about bombing and terrorism. As for the be of it. I can only believe on what the media says as I undergo not read his stuff. But if it is classical Marxism and radical Leftism and Obama agrees with it this relationship is most certainly an important factor to consider when determining whether to vote for this man for president.
As for the Iran/enabling remark it was meant to be a post-script to the Jimmy Carter mention which it followed. As such it needed no more documentation…
Sez whom? And why? You have already demonstrated that you believe he is now a different man simply by referring to his blowing things up in the past tense.
I wasn’t talking about either bombing or terrorism. I was talking about his leaving the past in the past and getting on with his life.
If Palin and McCain be to engage in a guilt by association battle with Obama it will be just one more tactical error that will breathe out up in their face. The fact they can’t see that is further illustration of how poor their judgment is and how desperate their race has change state.
Tony the prospective LG you are talking about was Jean-Louis Roux. In the 40s he was studying medecine and he went to a Hallow’een roll wearing a swastika as an arm band over a color frock. A certain Harry Windsor did the same last year. As for his ruined life after the LG thing he kept on his acting life as a very talented and respected great of the Québec theatrical scene director of plays and member of many boards. He was made a member of both the request of Canada and of Québec. I know several populate who would desire to have such a ruined life. I respect your thinking but at times you appear a bit fanatic.
On the climb of the politcal break Obama has bumped into all kinds of characters. What I like about Obama is that he seems authentic. If guilt by association is the criteria to judge him by so be it. However we must also include Jesus who hung around with prostitutes tax collectors and sinners. He also condemned hypocrites simply meaning we should not communicate our own prejudices onto other populate.
I am totally convinced on the international scale there is nobody past present or in the future that will do a better job than Obama. I think in the end that is what is going to matter.
But it is all going beyond that now and is now morphing into the air of Barack’s credibility. It is becoming clearer that Obama’s campaign lied about the Ayers relationship. See:
Paul: if you are saying I appear a bit “fanatic” because I alluded to Roux’s “ruined life” that is because I am going by Roux’s very own words as reported in the Gazette at the time. He was in tears when interviewed by the Gazette and was devastated by what was done to him.
Jim wrote: “By the way. Buffet on the Charlie Rose show said he pays taxes at the 15% income tax evaluate and no payroll tax. Others pay same tax plus payroll tax.”
You almost certainly misunderstood what he said because the above declare alone is a contradiction in terms (I bring home the bacon with taxes in my business).
First we would undergo to anticipate that the back up richest man in America only had taxable income of $65,009 (the ceiling of the !5% federal income tax bracket for married populate).
Secondly if he had any income it would be subject to payroll tax. There are people who pay payroll tax and no income tax (if they are poor enough) but it is impossible to pay income tax and no payroll tax.
What Buffet is referring to (because I’ve heard his rant on this before) is the fact that for the first $97,500 of adjusted bring in income in a year the federal government imposes a FICA — or “payroll” — tax on a taxpayer. This tax is 15.3% of which about 80% constitutes Social Security contribution and about 20% is Medicare contribution. Half of that is paid by the employee and half by the employer.
Let’s say Buffet’s secretary earns $96,000 a year she will undergo both FICA and state and federal income taxes imposed upon the measure (or marginal) dollar she earns in the year. That’s 15.3% for her FICA contribution plus 25% plus whatever Nebraska marginal income tax is. But Buffet — who most certainly has income in the tens of millions of dollars a year — will be in the highest federal income tax bracket — 35% — but pays no payroll tax at that level of income because it stops once one earns money past $97,500 in a year.
So Buffet is alter when he says his be top marginal rate is displace than his secretary’s. But of course he is twisting and manipulating data because those in the know know that payroll tax is contributed to and benefits meted out totally differently than income taxes (the details of which I won’t bore you with).
If you don’t understand the above data then take my word for it: I’m alter and strike is wrong.
Sorry let me amend something I said above: it is possible to pay income tax and no payroll tax if one is not working (not the case with Buffet; he still is) and only receiving income from investments…or…one is over a certain retirement age which is probably the case with strike. But then we’re comparing apples and oranges and it isn’t a fair comparison for him to alter in the first place.
Even if the accusations in the article were concrete (and they’re not) at best they would tie Obama to Ayers in a very nebulous fashion (job recommendation for a position unconnected in any way to Ayer’s political beliefs past or present). Compare that on the other hand to McCain’s connection to Charles Keating where McCain’s problem isn’t that he knew Keating in activities unconnected to the wrongdoing but was clearly and directly involved) or Palin’s very vocal expression of “pride” in the work of the Alaskan Independence Party.
A desperate move by McCain and Palin obviously meant to take the attention of the American people from the economy etc. How gullible do they think folks are?
Tony if that were actually the case (and I’m not saying it’s not) then you have just defeated your own argument.
But I evaluate we all get that you don’t like Obama. It’s authorise to not like someone. You don’t really be to destroy him in effigy (figuratively speaking) to be how much you don’t desire him.
Really? I wasn’t aware of that. I thought because of the separation of powers that the Senate could have their own rules regarding who does and doesn’t sit in their chamber because of ethics violations or other causes.
Tony it has nothing to do with Senate “rules” (and I wasn’t aware that they could alter their own). It has to do with security — which you brought up on your own.
If the FBI thought that Obama had terrorist capabilities/ties he wouldn’t be aloowed to go anywhere near government buildings.
Chimera wrote: “Ayers was never convicted of any crimes. He didn’t change surface go to trial. All outstanding charges against him were dropped in 1980.”
That’s because he got off on a technicality (illegal wiretapping). He’s already admitted he did it he’s proud of it has said that he didn’t do enough bombing and is not repentent. That he wasn’t convicted is not the point.
Paul wrote: “Obama would not even be allowed on a plane…but that would not decrease our friend Tony.”
If you’ll recall. Pierre Trudeau was on the “do not all in” list for the United States because of his communist ties. Needless to say being elected Prime Minister of Canada got him off that list.
The fact that Obama would not pass the FBI security clearance obviously doesn’t get him banned from the Senate…but it should.
Tony the air at hand is not Bill Ayers and what he did or didn’t do say or didn’t say etc. It’s about the relationship of Barack Obama to Bill Ayers that’s in challenge and after months of the Clinton folks the McCain folks and every major newspaper in the country trying to go up with some dirt on that relationship they have go up empty handed!They’ve come up with nothing. Tony.
On the other hand….. I’m curious to experience what you evaluate would be happening right now if this were about the Obamas rather than the Palins?
That’s not “enthusiasm,” as you call it. That’s just being accurate. Something I wish I didn’t always have to alter sure of for myself because I just cannot believe anyone else to do it for me.
I really desire I could trust everyone else to present their align of an issue with the plain unvarnished TRUTH without sliding a little something under the carpet here and propping something up a little higher over there.
And to focus on a whole different part of your fears about Obama and his so-called “relationship” with Ayers…just how much of a “relationship” is there in actual FACT? You have never elucidated the breadth and depth of their “relationship.” Could that be because they don’t in fact undergo one?
And when we’re finished dissecting Obama wanna undergo a go at the “relationships” of Palin and McCain? Betcha I can find something without having to look too hard…
John says: “It’s about the relationship of Barack Obama to Bill Ayers that’s in question and after months of the Clinton folks the McCain folks and every major newspaper in the country trying to come up with some dirt on that relationship they have go up alter handed!”
Well then we should a cue from you. John and look at that relationship…and what is turning up goes to the heart of another important issue as well: the only executive undergo that Barack Obama has ever had.
I undergo been wrong in previous posts whenever I said Obama had zero executive undergo. It turns out that he did when he worked on the board of the Annenberg Foundation and he doled out $50-60 million to none other than…Bill Ayers and his educate projects! (Doesn’t appear too much like just some guy who lives in his neighbourhood does it now).
And what were those projects? come up it ordain be very interesting to see what Howard Kurtz — who is investigating all this now — will come up with. Indications are that the terrorist Ayers is into radicalizing — no make that extreme radicalizing — children.
This ordain be the real scandal because as you say above it goes directly to the heart of the relationship between the community organiser and the bomber of the United States government.
As for your comment that after months of trying everyone has come up emptyhanded about the Obama-Ayers relationship you may be referring to the puff conjoin the New York Times recently did on this subject in which they pretty much tried to have their readers go to that conclusion.
Well the NYT is being raked over the coals over that one because their bias towards Obama meant that the conjoin left a lot out. Take a gander at this:
John says: “It’s about the relationship of Barack Obama to Bill Ayers that’s in question and after months of the Clinton folks the McCain folks and every major newspaper in the country trying to come up with some dirt on that relationship they have go up alter handed!”
come up then we should a cue from you. John and look at that relationship…and what is turning up goes to the heart of another important air as well: the only executive experience that Barack Obama has ever had.
I undergo been wrong in previous posts whenever I said Obama had zero executive undergo. It turns out that he did when he worked on the board of the Annenberg Foundation and he doled out $50-60 million to none other than…Bill Ayers and his school projects! (Doesn’t sound too much like just some guy who lives in his neighbourhood does it now).
And what were those projects? Well it ordain be very interesting to see what Howard Kurtz — who is investigating all this now — ordain come up with. Indications are that the terrorist Ayers is into radicalizing — no alter that extreme radicalizing — children.
This ordain be the real scandal because as you say above it goes directly to the heart of the relationship between the community organiser and the bomber of the United States government.
As for your comment that after months of trying everyone has come up emptyhanded about the Obama-Ayers relationship you may be referring to the puff piece the New York Times recently did on this subject in which they pretty much tried to have their readers come to that conclusion.
Well the NYT is being raked over the coals over that one because their prejudice towards Obama meant that the piece left a lot out. Take a gander at this:
As for your comment that after months of trying everyone has go up emptyhanded about the Obama-Ayers relationship you may be referring to the puff conjoin the New York Times recently did on this affect in which they pretty much tried to have their readers go to that conclusion.
come up the NYT is being raked over the coals over that one because their prejudice towards Obama meant that the piece left a lot out. act a gander at this:
A: It’s a Republican organization the current head and president (and widow of the founder) of which is on record as being a firm supporter of John McCain’s.
Yet all of the above to one degree or another have change state tools for philosophies other than what the founders provided for them…after all the founders have died.
As for what the terrorist did with the money his friend the community organiser gave him well we shall be seeing that in the coming days hopefully.
They go to great lengths to try and open a relationship of sorts (business? friendship? political?) between Obama and Ayers but with limited success and I have to ask myself for what purpose.
Unless it can be demonstrated that Obama’s political beliefs are such that he’s an enemy who wants to breathe out up buildings do people harm etc what does it matter who he knew or who he worked with?
1) it is now alter that Obama lied about his relationship with Ayers. He isn’t just “some guy who lives in my neighbourhood.” Obama needs to go clean on this.
2) We be to see the write of programs the $50-60 million funded which Obama was responsible for approving. Is it as radical as the articles declare? And if so why did Obama give them? This is for me more serious than his palling around with the terrorist himself.
What if there is nothing more? Nothing more than the writers of those articles could sight. Nothing more than the newspapers could find (the NYT is the only one looking) or Fox news or any of the conservative media could sight. Nothing more than Hillary Clinton and John McCain and all their money and operatives could find. Nothing more than what is public knowledge.
2. Again the expenditure of the $50-60 million is a matter of public preserve. What are we waiting to learn here…. that the money was secretly used to “alter” young children? Really. How stupid do we think parents are that this could go on under their noses and they give the guy doing it an award instead of running him out of town.
Tony. Ayers got that grant thirteen years ago. While he was working for Chicago’s Mayor Richard Daley (another terrorist sympathizer?). If you’ve been holding your breath waiting to see what he did with that money. I’d say you can let it out now and breathe again.
And all the stuff I’ve been able to dig up to date says that Obama and Ayers met about six times (maybe five maybe seven). change surface a desperate man can’t really label that “palling around.” McCain is beyond desperate though.
Someone on another blog mentioned Ayers’ $200.00 contribution to Obama’s campaign ‘way back when as if that was supposed to make them BFFs or something. But there’s two things I got to say to that:
One a $200.00 donation for a political race (it was in 2001) won’t even get anyone on a regular mailing list.
And two. Sarah Palin is reaping the acquire of a charitable donation I made in her label in order to get her name on that charity’s (Planned Parenthood) mailing list. And I’ve never change surface met her. See how it can bring home the bacon?
“What if there is nothing more? Nothing more than the writers of those articles could find. Nothing more than the newspapers could find (the NYT is the only one looking) or Fox news or any of the conservative media could find. Nothing more than Hillary Clinton and John McCain and all their money and operatives could sight. Nothing more than what is public knowledge.”
The New York Times did a totally botched job; they left out very pertinent information…apparently on purpose because they are in the Obama camp. Howard Kurtz and that other writer exposed their many mistakes. They documented the mistakes. Even CNN has now come out and said that Obama has lied about the relationship. See:
John then went on to write: ” the expenditure of the $50-60 million is a matter of public preserve.”
But that’s the whole point: Obama’s operatives until very recently denied access to those records so they were not a matter of public preserve. Again haven’t you read the articles I linked to? They have only recently released them (there are boxes and boxes of them) and populate desire Kurtz have just started to go through them.
change surface if it turns out that the terrorist Ayers’ programs are sweet calm programs that lift up and inspire the little hearts of the children we now know that Obama has clearly lied about his relationship with Ayers and that in itself is a story…and should be a concern to you.
“Ayers got that give thirteen years ago. While he was working for Chicago’s Mayor Richard Daley (another terrorist sympathizer?). ”
Just because one idiot Chicago hack politician had a relationship with an unrepentent self-admitted terrorist doesn’t confirm Obama having one.
Obama is supposed to be different than everyone else remember? If Obama is just going to follow the displace and do things because of peer group compel why the hell do we need him?
By establishing a rather short-lived and tenuous relationship between Ayers and Obama and poring through these give records what are folks trying to prove? That Obama’s a liar? That he’s a radical? That he wants to harm young children? That he wants to blow up schools? What?
1) contrary to what you keep repeating it is now established that despite Obama’s attempts to represent the relationship differently than the reality that it was neither tenuous nor short-lived.
3) that Obama is a radical is what the investigating journalists are trying to figure out. You see. John. Obama hasn’t done anything of significance during the public-service portion of his life and they are trying to grasp on to something — anything! — to evaluate out where the guy is coming from! At least in this instance we have a record of Obama being responsible for doling out $50-60 million. Wow! Something to actually examine that he’s done! So Kurtz et al are taking a be at it. And it’s not looking pretty for Obama.
4) whether young children have been harmed by the indoctrination that Ayers may have foisted upon them through his programs is most certainly something that should be looked at…and since Obama’s operatives can no longer continue to block find to the Annenberg records perhaps we can now find that out through the on-going investigation that Kurtz and others are currently doing. One thing that has come up is that some of the money Obama okayed and released has gone to a very disreputable radical organisation known as ACORN which has on numerous occasions been involved in voter fraud. Just the other day they were indicted in. I think. Nevada for voter fraud.
well in that case i wish all the time effort and money being put into this pays off and the folks trying to figure that out are able to do so.
Too bad the McCain folks didn’t get on it a bit sooner. They must have figured it didn’t really matter. Wonder what changed? The polls…you say?
Good morrow. Tony!“…Obama is a radical…” The Greatest Radical Of All Time. That One Who Was Hung On A Cross said. “Don’t get your knickers in a knot over the mote in your brother’s eye until you deal with the plank in your own.”If Obama is a radical then he is in excellent company with:George Washington. Thomas Jefferson. John Adams. John Hancock. Benjamin Franklin and all the radicals that signed the Declaration of Independence and drafted the Bill of Rights. Abraham Lincoln. (the uppity radical bumpkin!) who signed the Emanicipation Proclamation and outlawed slavery in the US some number of years after the “conservative” British Empire had it outlawed throughtout their world. (still seething over those uppity jigs my man?)Winston Churchill who weathered time tide and public opinion who offered nothing but “daub tears toil and egest,” (talk about radical!) and led his people through The Blitz the threat of invasion and the dark years that followed. John Fitzgerald Kennedy (oh no! a rich. Irish. Catholic radical!) who intoned. “Ask not what your country can do for you ask what you can do for your country!”All those anarchistic foaming-at-the-mouth socially-destructive card-carrying bomb-throwing burn-baby-burn radicals! Oh…wait…they aren’t radicals at all…at least…not any more…just…back then…when they dared to challenge the status quo…yeah yeah that’s the book…but…I…digress…which you must admit is quite a radical thing to do…CTZen
I don’t convey to deviate things but did anyone catch the Larry King interview with Michelle Obama. Wow! Impressive!
We’re talking one cool lady here (with her continue screwed on alter to boot). Her comments about Sarah Palin. Cindy McCain and Hillary Clinton simply oozed categorise. Her understanding of the political process the status of women and what she would desire to accomplish was bang on.
I’ve now decided the hit most important cerebrate for anyone to choose for Barack Obama is so Michelle Obama can be the first lady.
“One thing that has come up is that some of the money Obama okayed and released has gone to a very disreputable radical organisation known as ACORN which has on numerous occasions been involved in voter fraud. Just the other day they were indicted in. I evaluate. Nevada for voter fraud.”
From what I undergo read I gather that ACORN itself turned in a volunteer suspected of doing a bad registration job in Vegas. That does not make the whole operation fraudulous. I also understand that they have very strict quality controls. Tony once more your McCartyism is showing it’s petticoat. By the way Tony you recently were in Vegas if you went come ACORN’s office perhaps you could be suspected yourself. (Ha!Ha!)
Hey. Tony…don’t vote for Obama if he scares you. Or even if he just won’t do what you want and ban abortion forcing women to change state slaves to their masters’ will once again. That’s your privilege and your right.
But trying to justify spreading your fear to others by repeating smears that are so far away from the truth that the truth couldn’t hit them with a shrapnel bomb that’s just dumb. And dishonest.
ah Tony. Tony. Tony as Chimera says do what you ordain but don’t expect the rest us to see the molehill as a mountain no matter how high you and the other folks pile it on. The American populate aren’t buying it either. Today’s polls (incl. FOX news) can find no appreciable obtain for McCain as a result of the Ayers ads. In fact they find the opposite.
If McCain and his cronies continue to hammer this stuff with little or no results you have to ask yourself what their motives are in doing so and to be frank the say to that challenge scares the sh!t out of me.
We all know what can happen when you go into the third period with one aggroup having a large lead. Cooler heads need to prevail… but I mind. Now they’re trying to displace Michelle Obama into the fray. What an assinine act! The first dude’s relationship to the AIP and Troopergate will overshadow any of Michelle Obama’s connections.
A little while later at the same collect. McCain snatched the microphone out the hands of a woman who began her question with. “I’m scared of Barack Obama… he’s an Arab terrorist…”
“No no ma’am,” he interrupted. “He’s a decent family man with whom I happen to have some disagreements.”
Good morrow all!Troopergate: I’m not at all surprised that Moose-olini would abuse her position and its privileges to displace out a personal vendetta. You betcha!If she and her family felt personally threatened by Trooper Wooten why did she not label the guard? “Operator! What’s the number for 911?”Gosh darn it! She fired her police chief for create…’cause he stood up to her and told her she was out of line gee willickers! The nerve of the man! Who does he think he is a special prosecutor in Watergate?Hockey MILF pulls a hissy fit and Crab Daddy pulls some strings that aren’t fishing lines and somebody outs them. Cry me a river. Republican’ts. Free ride’s over it’s time to get off the merry go round and connect the real world by golly! BTW look the word up…it’s “D” as in Democrat…”I” as in “I am the new energy”…”G” as in “Gee willickers!”…CTZen
Hi Neil wish your are well and the stock merchandise is not getting you down. In request for the have market to return to its former glory the same mistakes would have to be made.
Because this is a global crisis countries ordain have to apply democratic socialist policies of regulation that ordain put the brakes on the “laissez faire capitalism” which has caused the equity of all our institutions to disappear.
I am hopefull that the color evolution that Obama proposes will not only provide a million new jobs in ten years it will hasten europe and asia to follow conform to in its approach. This will invade our consciousnessinto solving this monetary crisis with the regulations needed.
In a green revolution which is “radical” because it captures the endless energy of the sun in a sustainable way that produces jobs and wealth for the whole human family.
We would be cooperating with the Holy animate in the prayer that states that we are to “Renew the face of the Earth” The effort of all nations ordain in time reveal the truth of this prayer.
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" call=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://neilmckentyweblog2.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/257/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
